
This blog post is AI-generated by Claude and inspired by the original PolyTripper video linked below.
Hi Language Buddy!
I hope you had a productive week. Today I'm going to say something that counters the whole reason for PolyTripper's existence—and I want to be completely honest with you about it.
PolyTripper was built so you can learn a language in a country that doesn't necessarily speak the language you want to learn. For example, if I'm here in the United States and want to learn French, I can use PolyTripper to achieve a good level of French while living in the United States.
A case in point is Russian. I started Russian in summer 2020 alongside you students because I wanted to be in the trenches with you. I wanted to learn alongside you, struggle the way you're struggling.
I already know a number of languages that you're studying, but I wanted to learn a very difficult one—Russian—so I could be challenged in the same way you're being challenged and struggle and learn together with you.
Now I can basically have unstructured conversations of unbounded length and express myself, and I've never been to a Russian-speaking country. So I know exactly what can be achieved through remote learning.
But this week I want to acknowledge something counter to that mission: if you really want to take your language learning to the next level, you might have to go live in the country.
I'm privileged and lucky to know exactly what to do to learn a language while living here in the United States. But I want to stay honest about the limits.
Granted, there are plenty of people who live in a country and don't learn the language. I know Mexicans who live here and hardly speak a word of English. My Russian teacher tells me many of her Russian-speaking students learning English are based in the United States and their English isn't that great.
So it's very possible to live in a country and not learn the language.
The flip side is that there are limits to what can be achieved without living in the country. Those limits are very high—I speak Swedish and Russian pretty decently, meaning I can get my point across and be understood. It's not great, but it's actually pretty impressive for never having set foot in those countries at all.
But I've structured a lot of my language learning around having country visits as rewards. With Italian, for example, I went there for the first time in November 2017. My first goal was to take a week-long language course in Genoa with a one-on-one teacher, then I explored with my teacher and her boyfriend afterward.
Every time I've gone to a country—Spanish-speaking countries, living in Spain, living in the Netherlands, traveling extensively in Germany and staying with friends—my language level has jumped in a way that was much more dramatic than online language instruction alone could provide.
Studies help explain why country experience creates such dramatic improvements:
Input frequency: Research shows that native speakers typically speak 2-3 times faster than language teachers, forcing rapid processing adaptation.
Context richness: Studies demonstrate that real-world contexts provide semantic and cultural cues that classroom settings cannot replicate.
Urgency motivation: Research indicates that survival needs (navigation, food, shelter) create intense motivation that accelerates acquisition.
Error consequence: Studies show that real-world miscommunication has immediate consequences that improve retention of corrections.
Cultural integration: Research demonstrates that understanding cultural context dramatically improves pragmatic competence.
Country experience provides several unique advantages:
Constant exposure: You can't escape the language—every interaction requires it.
Accent variety: You hear regional variations, different age groups, and social contexts.
Real-time pressure: Immediate communication needs force rapid skill development.
Cultural nuance: You learn not just what to say, but how, when, and to whom to say it.
Identity immersion: You temporarily become a person who operates in that language and culture.
From my experiences in various countries, I've noticed:
Listening comprehension accelerates: Real-world speech patterns become much clearer much faster.
Speaking confidence soars: Successful real-world interactions build confidence that classroom practice can't match.
Cultural competence develops: You learn unspoken rules about communication styles and social expectations.
Vocabulary expands naturally: You learn words in context rather than through abstract study.
Fluency rhythm improves: Natural conversation patterns become internalized through constant exposure.
Even with excellent online instruction and self-study, certain things are harder to develop remotely:
Speed processing: Native-speed conversation in noisy, real-world environments.
Cultural intuition: Understanding subtle social cues and unspoken communication rules.
Dialect familiarity: Exposure to regional variations and non-standard speech patterns.
Situational language: Using language appropriately in diverse social and professional contexts.
Confidence under pressure: Performing linguistically when stakes are high and help isn't available.
That said, online language instruction plus self-study when you don't have the ability to travel is the next best thing. And it's really, really quite impressive what you can achieve.
My Russian and Swedish abilities prove this—I can have meaningful conversations, express complex ideas, and connect with native speakers despite never visiting those countries.
Most people can't just pick up and move to another country. Considerations include:
Financial constraints: International travel and extended stays are expensive.
Family obligations: Work, children, and other commitments make immersion difficult.
Visa limitations: Legal barriers prevent extended stays in many countries.
Life stage timing: Immersion opportunities often don't align with optimal learning motivation.
Risk tolerance: Not everyone is comfortable with the uncertainty of international immersion.
While acknowledging immersion's advantages, remote learning can be optimized:
Seek authentic materials: Use real podcasts, news, and social media rather than just textbook content.
Find diverse conversation partners: Practice with people of different ages, regions, and backgrounds.
Create immersion bubbles: Dedicate specific times/spaces where only the target language is used.
Engage with culture: Study history, politics, and current events from target language sources.
Plan immersion rewards: Use future travel as motivation for current remote study.
I've found that structuring language learning around eventual country visits works well:
Motivation maintenance: Having a concrete goal keeps you engaged during difficult periods.
Skill preparation: You arrive with enough ability to benefit from immersion rather than just surviving.
Experience maximization: Good remote preparation lets you focus on advanced skills during country visits.
Cost efficiency: Brief, well-prepared immersion periods can be more effective than longer unprepared ones.
Living in the country is probably the best way to learn the language, but it's not the only way to achieve impressive results. The key is being realistic about what each approach can accomplish.
Remote learning can get you to a level where you can:
• Have meaningful conversations about complex topics
• Understand most media and literature
• Express yourself clearly and persuasively
• Connect emotionally with native speakers
But immersion adds layers of naturalness, cultural competence, and processing speed that are difficult to achieve remotely.
The ideal approach might be:
Phase 1: Build solid foundation through remote learning (online lessons + self-study)
Phase 2: Immersion experience to accelerate and naturalize skills
Phase 3: Return to remote learning to maintain and continue developing advanced competencies
Don't let the lack of immersion opportunities discourage you from starting or continuing language learning. Remote methods can achieve remarkable results. But if you have the chance for country experience, take it—the benefits are real and dramatic.
I'm just acknowledging this because I want to stay honest with you about both the possibilities and limitations of different approaches.
That's my honest assessment for this week: remote learning is incredibly effective, but immersion adds something special that's worth pursuing when possible.
Take care, and I'll see you next week!